T171 TMA01/Question One
T171 TMA01/Question Two
Model One Exam Review
Model Two Exam Review
Model Three Exam Review
About
|
Policy
|
e-mail
|
|
T171 YOU, Your Computer and the Net |
|
|
Question One
Evaluate the coverage of the various Microsoft Antitrust cases on the following two sites. For
each site write a brief commentary (no more than 450 words for each site;
900 in total) which addresses the following points:
1- What information did the site cover, e.g. did it try to present a summary of the facts or did it also give opinions? Did
it try to give complete and up-to- date coverage, or did it appear
to be selective?
2- Did the site present a balanced view or did it represent one perspective?
3- How easy was the site to navigate?
4- Your overall opinion of the site and say why.
5- How the site could be improved. Sites:
-
BBC News coverage of Microsoft
T-based in the UK, this section is part of their general online news service.
-
Wired Magazine's Antitrust section
- part of the web site for a US-technology magazine.
As you would expect from the one
of the largest news provider in the world. BBC.com has had considerable care and
attention poured into it to make absolutely certain that it presents a clear,
accessible, up-to-minute news to all aspects of modern life starting from sport,
passing through politics, ending in business. Even without (Back) and (Next)
bottoms, you can navigate through the page using the browser's bottoms
and the search engine that is placed on the right top of the page. Related
Microsoft Antitrust case articles are categorized in such a way that the link
has to change its colour when it is visited, so you will not feel missed. The
site search engine plays a major role in finding quickly and clearly what you
need. The colour scheme seems clean, modern and professional. From another hand
the objectivity of the site is clearly "NEWS", and it is not a mask
for advertising. The currency of the links at the right down and the left of the
screen is up to date and there is no dead links. For the over all coverage
the pages of the site did no require special soft-ware to view the information
and it is totally free news.
page there is very clear links under attractive titles that provide
complete and up-to-date coverage. As BBC.com is a reputable news provider it reflects its balanced
view through mentioning the perspectives of both players in that case -
Microsoft and the US Government. "The US Department of Justice alleged that
Microsoft had used its domination of the operating system market to restrict
competition." Microsoft said
"it faced a great deal of competition and that its actions reflected that fact."
The overall impression was that the site does what it sets out to do. If there
was one criticism, it was that the name of the writer or the analyst and his
direct e-mail or phone number is not mentioned, also navigation could be
improved by adding "back", "next" and "top" bottoms.
TOP
Question Two
Choose two messages that you have sent to your T171 Tutor Group conference (or
one of the other T171 conferences) which you felt were successful but which could be improved.
With reference to the principles outlined in Gary Alexander's paper:
Netiquette, or the social conventions of computer
conferencing explain why you consider each message was successful and one way in which each
could be improved. Your explanation should not exceed 500 words in total. This does not include the
length of the messages themselves.
This page is part of the achieve of wired.com which it is clear from its URL
that it is a commercial web which depends on Ads to fund its activities.
The page
that we are focusing on has 20 links that is supposed to discuss Microsoft Anti-trust case from
different points of view. But you will be surprised when you find that there is a lot of
articles that did not relate to the main subject, such as "Microsoft Plays to Film Industry"
that discuss how Microsoft wants Hollywood to use its Media Player technology in the industry from
start to finish...etc. Both the time and the date is labeled beside every link. The navigation in
this site is a kind of mess - no back & next bottoms and the articles are not categorized
under clear titles. You will found a mix of articles dealing with different subjects
where Micro-soft is a major player. Under the antitrust title there was an article that
shows how "EU Tries to Force MS to Compete".
The search engine at the right top of the page can be remarked as a good point for this site in
which its simplify the searching process. The background is simple. I found this site not so
balanced in which the focus was on the superiority of Microsoft and its customer services - ex. Worm
exploits weak link. The animated ads at the right of the screen are not relevant to the subject of the
articles. The information found in this site (at least for me) is weak because LYCOS
"collect information from the free member registration to enhance
the content you see on the Lycos Network, such as news, stocks portfolios..."
The most important critique for this site is that the Privacy Policy is placed at the bottom of
the page in which the visitor can not easily found the terms and conditions of
of the information he/she is searching for. Form my point of view this site could be improved
(If managers want to keep in "NEWS" field) by employing professionals and expertise in NEWS field
to improve the quality of their information. And from technical view, navigation could be enhanced
by using attractive titles to categorize the articles under related topics. And "Next",
"back", "top" bottoms will play a crucial role.
TOP
Evaluating these two webs is based on :
-
http://www.library.cornell.edu/olinuris/ref/research/webcrit.html
-
http://www.library.jhu.edu/researchhelp/general/evaluating/index.html
-
http://www.siec.k12.in.us/~west/edu/rubric1.htm
|
|
|
|
|
|